In chapter 2, Albert Knox states that “It seems if in the process of growing up, we lose the ability to wonder about the world”. What does he mean? Do you agree with him? Explain why or why not using examples from this first section of the novel P1-120 and your own life experiences.
Wonder – to have a feeling of curiosity or doubt.
By relating certain circumstances along with examples from ‘Sophie’s World’, I have come to the point where I can self-assuredly say, that I agree to the statement ‘It seems if in the process of growing up, we lose the ability to wonder about the world.’ It just seems like we are since our curiosity on certain things are pushed back in our minds. We think about these questions unconsciously which constantly come back during our spare moments, making every doable appearance.
As a philosophy teacher, he advises that the faculty of wonder is the key to being a successful philosopher and that everyone is born naturally with ‘this faculty’ and an inquiring mind as they are ‘slipping out to the reality.’ We tend to think about more things because we comprehend the basics and yearn to discover more complicated concerns. Instead, as we age, the faculty of wonder increases.
As we grow up, the world is examined further. The obvious factors such as identifying a dog as a dog instead of ‘bow-wow’ are learnt therefore it is harder to conjecture about things that are intangible and indefinite. For the obvious questions that we have already found out the answer to, we do not wonder. We just use our previous experiences to explain the current ones.
So, do adults really lose the faculty of wonder? No. They do not. Each and every day, they get used to more things they have done before and follow a simple routine. As we age, there is less to explore so it ‘seems’ we wonder less but this really is not the case. All adults seem to know what is right or wrong and lives by the social norms. As they are more focused on other major issues such as occupation and family, questioning about the unknown becomes a less of a concern to them, as shown through Sophie’s mom when she dissipates Sophie’s faculty of wonder by questioning her back. At the age of 5, I questioned why my granny wore glasses, once I understood why and was exposed to myself; I have lost my interest in wondering about it. Contrastingly, I asked where the universe come from and received a ‘I don't know’ as a response, so up till now, I still wonder about this matter but is not as concerned since it is not life threatening and there are other factors which are prioritized in my life. Seeing that we will ‘never get to the bottom’ of unanswerable questions, even though there might ‘be a solution elsewhere’, and that historical philosophers are not providing us with satisfactory answers, we tend to ‘crawl deeper down the rabbits fur’ as we get older.
Carrying on, priorities play a major role, we tend to focus on what is imminent, for example blogging this instead of sitting in the room and staring at blank space- wondering. As we grow up and get more preoccupied, less time is left to ponder such issues. Thus, the necessity to wonder is not as great/ important in comparison to other life matters. Once no answer is given, interest is lost and the desire to question diminishes. Once an answer is given, either through science or pure theory, the desire to question also diminishes. Both ways, the desire diminishes. Our wonder craves about eternally debatable topics such as the universe is pushed back to our unconscious minds and reappears only when raised.
‘What would you think’ if you have seen a Martian climbing out from a spaceship? Would you think of yourself a Martian. The main reason as to why we wonder about this is because we do not know whether Martians exist. Furthermore, other humans are exposed to as one of us therefore we do not wonder about them. Expanding from that point, we only think about the questions when we are asked, prompted and exposed to such as ‘what is the most important thing in life.’ Such as this assignment, we do not wonder if our ability to wonder is seemingly diminishing in our ordinary life because it does not concern us as much. From my own experience, I have only started to wonder about afterlife when I have seen death. Reluctant to do so, it seems like it is necessary to. Since we already know what is in laid before us, and is adequate to guide our way to success, it is not essential to wonder about redundant things which will not aid us in our normal ordinary lives but acts as an obstruction instead.
I disagree to point raised earlier by another student that the ‘future is unknown therefore there is no point in wondering about it.’ Yes, the future is unknown and THAT is why we still wonder about it. As defined above, we wonder only when we don't know or in doubt of something, therefore if the future is known then there really is no point in wondering about it.
Another dilemma as to why we ‘seem’ to lose our ability to wonder is due to the fact that some people are drawn away from these themes as they are frightened by the unknown. Most people would not want to think about anything philosophical, knowing that they would be petrified by knowing the unknown.
To bring to a close, the ability to wonder ‘seems’ to be lost as we age but it is not. It simply changes through time, gets pressed back in our minds and increases gradually unconsciously. Unlike children and philosophers, any adult would rather ‘crawl deep into the rabbit’s fur…snuggle…comfortably’ and ‘stay for there for the rest of their lives’ than to explore and ‘wonder’ more about the world fearing that they would not get the answer at all, the way they wanted it to be or how severely it would interfere with their lives. Prioritizations come into place and ‘seemingly’ diminish our ability to wonder. So finally it is not our faculty of wonder that diminishes but the necessity and availability of things to wonder about.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
What you said about the future is somewhat true. However, different people have different perspective towards what they think about the future and if they should or should not wonder about it.
I really liked how you contradicted with other peoples statement. It shows you've truly thought about the book thoroughly (:
Your statement about our wonders being diverted towards other themes as we grow up is very true, we just don't concentrate on some questions, intead we think about other more pressing dilemas such as homework or housing problems . In the modern city we live in, most of the answers can be available quickly and effectively e.g the internet , and there's less need to ponder and ponder about what is 'unknown'.
You are partialy right when you say we dont wonder because we use past experiences to explain current ones, but sometimes there are questiones that cant be answered without hesitation? We will question why for example people fight, but because the question cannot be answered because we don't know enough about it and because we only know part of the answer - which is not fully proven and is still disputable - we will still wonder why people fight because the answer is not satifying enough.
Yes Chloe. I'm not entirely sure about what you mean by the example given of why people fight but this example is more of a personal matter so the answer to it varies from person to person.
Very true, I agree entirely.
Does sophie actually mean contrasted with other people's statement cause you can't contradict a personal opinion/response with somebody else's opinion.
I think?
Nice work on the essay.
It was very interesting to read with the different points well-stated.
The way you made the points contrast with each other were good and I find them very convincing.
You said you've wondered about the questions asked in the book before, but have you gotten a proper answer to them? Like is there life after death and such?
I did mean contradict because she's embedded someone else's point and argued against it. She also developed it and incorporated into her own argument.
That's more like contradicting than a contrast right?
I also agree in anita's point . but chole, it is confusing that you
referred your example as fighting between two people. For example, anita
and abi get into a fight because abi had eaten her lemon pie- see with out
a reason to fight, then what are they fighting for? Without any reason
then....they shouldn't be fighting...maybe did you mean, people are
fighting because of having misconceptions?
In a way anita, i think that you are right, this is because you "seem" to lose the concept of wondering about the world. But personally, i think that this is untrue. This is because even though adults or grown ups might seem to lose the concept of wondering about the world. But think in another way, i think not all grown ups lose this concept. This is because then why would there be scientist that helps the world by inventing better cures? why would we go and explore the space when we stop wondering the world? these kind of questions comes up. therefore, i think that this statement doesn't really support the idea of losing the concept.
Michael: I totally agree with the comment you raised earlier but that is not my point. I agree to the extent that we 'seem' to lose our faculty of wonder but we are actually NOT. Therefore, some people perceive us as 'losing' our ability to wonder as we grow up.
I didnt actually state that our faculty of wonder is diminishing as we grow up but it seems to be.
So back to the point about scientists, they will definately wonder because if they dont then no inventions would be made. This is an exception because not everyone is a scientist. Generally, the majority of the population 'seem' to lose their faculty of wonder (whilst they're not actually) as they tend to gain more experience.
Post a Comment